Hair loss, thinning, and slow hair growth are common concerns today. While FDA-approved treatments like minoxidil and finasteride are available, many people prefer alternative solutions. Two popular medical treatments for hair restoration are Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and Growth Factor Concentrate (GFC). PRP has been used for years with scientific backing, whereas GFC is a newer method that has sparked curiosity and misconceptions. Understanding their differences can help you make an informed decision.
What is PRP?
PRP therapy involves extracting plasma from your own blood and injecting it into the scalp. The process includes centrifuging the blood to separate the platelet-rich plasma, which is packed with growth factors. When injected, these growth factors repair hair follicles, strengthen roots, and stimulate new hair growth. PRP is not only used for hair restoration but also in healing injuries and dental treatments.
PRP can be prepared in two ways:
-
Activated PRP: An activating agent (like calcium chloride or thrombin) is added to release growth factors before injection.
-
Unactivated PRP: No activating agent is added; platelets activate naturally upon contact with scalp tissue, releasing a greater amount of growth factors.
What is GFC?
GFC is a refined version of PRP with a standardized preparation process. It also involves extracting plasma from your blood but uses a specialized kit with pre-set protocols. These kits ensure accuracy, consistency, and higher concentrations of growth factors, making the treatment more effective. Like PRP, GFC strengthens hair roots and promotes regrowth.
PRP vs. GFC: Key Differences
-
Preparation Method: PRP preparation varies between clinics based on equipment and techniques, leading to inconsistent results. GFC uses standardized kits, ensuring uniform quality and effectiveness.
-
Stability: GFC remains stable at room temperature for a few hours, whereas PRP effectiveness reduces if stored for more than 2-4 hours.
-
Effectiveness: In well-equipped clinics, PRP and GFC yield similar results. However, if PRP preparation is inconsistent, GFC may provide better outcomes due to its standardized method.
Cost Comparison
GFC is more expensive than PRP due to the specialized kits used. On average:
-
PRP costs around INR 4000-5000 per session
-
GFC costs around INR 6000-8000 per session
At Taras Dental and Aesthetic Center, PRP costs INR 4000, while GFC costs INR 6000.
Which One Should You Choose?
Both PRP and GFC are effective for hair loss and have similar side effects, such as mild irritation and discomfort during injections. The choice depends on the clinic’s expertise, quality of equipment, and your personal preference. If you visit a reputable clinic like Taras Dental and Aesthetic Center, either treatment can deliver great results.
Final Thoughts
PRP and GFC are excellent treatments for hair thinning and hair loss caused by androgenetic alopecia, telogen effluvium, and other conditions. While they do not replace medications like finasteride or minoxidil, they enhance hair strength and thickness naturally. Choosing between PRP and GFC depends on your comfort level, budget, and the trust you place in your clinic and doctor.
For expert hair restoration treatments, visit Taras Dental and Aesthetic Center, where we ensure quality, safety, and the best results for your hair rejuvenation journey.
